Last data update: Apr 29, 2024. (Total: 46658 publications since 2009)
Records 1-2 (of 2 Records) |
Query Trace: Anderson KM[original query] |
---|
The Specificity of the Persistent IgM Neutralizing Antibody Response in Zika Viral Infections Among Individuals with Prior Dengue Virus Exposure
Calvert AE , Horiuchi K , Boroughs KL , Ong YT , Anderson KM , Biggerstaff BJ , Stone M , Simmons G , Busch MP , Huang CY . J Clin Microbiol 2021 59 (8) e0040021 Dengue viruses (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) are related mosquito-borne flaviviruses with similar disease manifestations, vector ecology and geographic range. The ability to differentiate these viruses serologically is vital due to the teratogenic nature of ZIKV and the potential confounding of pre-existing cross-reactive anti-DENV antibodies. Here we illustrate the kinetics of the IgM neutralizing antibody (NAb) response using longitudinal samples ranging from acute ZIKV infection to late convalescence from individuals with evidence of prior DENV infection. By serially depleting antibody isotypes prior to neutralization assay, we determined that IgM contributes predominantly to ZIKV neutralization, and it is less cross-reactive than the IgG NAb. The IgM NAb peaked around 14 days (95% CI: 13-15) with a median duration of 257 days (95% CI: 133-427). These results demonstrate the persistence of IgM NAb after ZIKV infections and imply its potential role in diagnosis, vaccine evaluation, serosurveillance, and research of flaviviral-host interactions. |
Lack of Serologic Evidence of Infection Among Health Care Personnel and Other Contacts of First 2 Confirmed Patients With COVID-19 in Illinois, 2020.
McPherson TD , Ghinai I , Binder AM , Freeman BD , Hoskin Snelling C , Hunter JC , Anderson KM , Davenport P , Rudd DL , Zafer M , Christiansen D , Joshi K , Rubin R , Black SR , Fricchione MJ , Pacilli M , Walblay KA , Korpics J , Moeller D , Quartey-Kumapley P , Wang C , Charles EM , Kauerauf J , Patel MT , Disari VS , Fischer M , Jacobs MW , Lester SN , Midgley CM , Rasheed MAU , Reese HE , Verani JR , Wallace M , Watson JT , Thornburg NJ , Layden JE , Kirking HL . Public Health Rep 2020 136 (1) 88-96 OBJECTIVES: Widespread global transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), continues. Many questions remain about asymptomatic or atypical infections and transmission dynamics. We used comprehensive contact tracing of the first 2 confirmed patients in Illinois with COVID-19 and serologic SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing to determine whether contacts had evidence of undetected COVID-19. METHODS: Contacts were eligible for serologic follow-up if previously tested for COVID-19 during an initial investigation or had greater-risk exposures. Contacts completed a standardized questionnaire during the initial investigation. We classified exposure risk as high, medium, or low based on interactions with 2 index patients and use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Serologic testing used a SARS-CoV-2 spike enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on serum specimens collected from participants approximately 6 weeks after initial exposure to either index patient. The 2 index patients provided serum specimens throughout their illness. We collected data on demographic, exposure, and epidemiologic characteristics. RESULTS: Of 347 contacts, 110 were eligible for serologic follow-up; 59 (17% of all contacts) enrolled. Of these, 53 (90%) were health care personnel and 6 (10%) were community contacts. Seventeen (29%) reported high-risk exposures, 15 (25%) medium-risk, and 27 (46%) low-risk. No participant had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The 2 index patients had antibodies detected at dilutions >1:6400 within 4 weeks after symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: In serologic follow-up of the first 2 known patients in Illinois with COVID-19, we found no secondary transmission among tested contacts. Lack of seroconversion among these contacts adds to our understanding of conditions (ie, use of PPE) under which SARS-CoV-2 infections might not result in transmission and demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing is a useful tool to verify epidemiologic findings. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Apr 29, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure